General secretary requested to comment on the revised proposal for upgradation of GP to IP, your valuable comments may be post here for taking decision and inform to GS before 18.9.2011
Revised Proposal for Upgradation of GP to Rs.4600/- for IP
CHQ has drafted revised proposal on the above subject and the same is furnished below for information of all CHQ Office Bearers/Circle Secretaries/Members. They are requested to kindly go through it and submit their suggestions,if any, to the CHQ after consulting Circle Working Committee members through Phone/Email/SMS by 18.09.2011 so that revised proposal could be submitted to the Department.In case of no reply from the Circle Secretaries by due date, it will be presumed that they are in favour of the revised proposal.
REVISED PROPOSAL
Post of Inspector,Posts may be merged withh the post of Asstt. Supdt. Posts with GP of Rs.4600/-with nomenclature as Asstt. Supdt. Posts as the Department has already merged the post of Inspector, MMS with the post of Asstt. Manager, MMS with the GP of Rs. 4600/- with nomenclature as Asstt. Manager, MMS. In the event of merger with upgraded GP of Rs. 4600/-, the Association is agreeable for withdrawal of Gazettted status granted to the post of Asstt. Supdt. Posts vide Postal Directorate memo. no. 25-18/2000-PE dated 28.07.2005. However, it is made clear that Gazetted status to the post of ASP should be withdrawn only after merger and grant of GP of Rs. 4600/- to the merged post simultaneously.
Roop Chand
General Secretary
Sir,
ReplyDeleteIt is very wise decision to merge IP and ASP posts, which will benefit both IPs and ASPs and will remove the disparity. Also , as we all be one many discrriminations will vanish themselves & will be more united.
It will be very kind on ASPs part if they agree to this decision of CHQ .
We should also think of starting pay for grade pay 4600 .
ReplyDeleteAt present it is Rs 12500 for direct recruits only ss per sixth pay commission report. If same is made available promoted officers also then it will be justice for all.
As direct IP will getting 12500+4600=17100 as starting pay and a PA Passed IP exam in immediately after 5 years get only 9300+4200 =13400 only
If this can also be addressed at this point it is a real benifit
other wise it is a great loss and in-justice for departmental PAs who are passed IP's
Hope others will also react to this comment who are sufferers
whether any latest rulings have come on this issue as it was a anomoly of sixth Pay commission
ReplyDeleteIt is a good decision to merge the IP and ASP cadre with the nomencultare as "ASP" by surrending the Gazetted status. Actually, what is the benefits earned by ASPOs by taking the Gazetted status?
ReplyDelete1. Signed in Green ink
2. Getting the reimbursement of News Paper bill at the rate of Rs.100 to Rs.120 month. It works out to Rs.1200 to Rs.1500 per year.
3. Loosing the PL Bonus worth of Rs.7000/- every year.
Instead of this, by surrendering the Gazetted status, IP & ASP cadre may be merged as "ASP" only with the GP of Rs.4600/-. From which, the PL bonus will be applicable to all and tranfer options will be more and also the pay can be upgraded by MACP after completion of 10/20/30 years.
Hence, GS may kindly be submitted the proposal at an earliest please.
CWC member of Karnataka Circle.
why u want to loose what u have got. U should finht for grade pay of 4600/- Have any union in the pastgot scales by loosing. It will be a black spot on the association.
ReplyDeleteit will be win win situation for all. departmental ips can go up to gp of 5400 by the time of retirement. it will make a big difference in pension benefits. for direct ips also they will get entry pay of 12540. please go for it.
ReplyDeletewhy a departmental person suffer by 3500 less amount even though he has server department for maore than Five years
ReplyDeletewhy a departmental person should suffer by Rs 3500 less amount even though he has laready served department for maore than Five years before becoming IP. I it Justifiable. Is it not humiliating situation departmental Passed IP
ReplyDeleteit is interesting post on kerala site as below.
ReplyDeleteca it be made available for karnataka ip union also. Can Any IP/ASP in circle office can complie this important information
IP/ASP List of Kerala Circle
A detailed list of the incumbents of all the IP/ASP posts in the Circle has been compiled and the same along with mobile numbers of all our members will be uploaded in the blog shortly. The summary of the position which emerges from the said compilation is as follows:
Total No. IP Posts in the Circle - 91
No. of posts where IPs in position- 66
No. of vacant posts - 25
Total No. of ASP Posts -109 (8 PM Posts)
No. of Posts where ASPs in position- 94
No. of vacant posts - 15 ( 1 PM Post)
in all other departments also there is a difference in entry pay if u r recruited directly and if u r a promotee. its nothing new. be it income tax, ag's office or any other dept. for that matter. we should not feel bad about it. gp of 4600 will also save one macp of us. so be united. dnt feel like departmental or direct. its a humble request.
ReplyDeletefraud at Sakleshpura Rs.2,00,000.
ReplyDeletewhy so much discussion of IP Grade Pay and CAT case waiting ..Somebody file CASE IN APEX COURT
ReplyDeleteIf the Proposed merger meterialised, 141 HSG Posts(presently managed by IP line officials) which are going to General line may be retained by our IP/ASP cadre.
ReplyDeleteSorry friend, if the proposed merger took place, it is easy for the department to transfer those 141 HSG posts to the general line as there will be no chance to hold a HSG post by the IP. Moreover, we will lose the reason "it is a promotional post to IP" to fight the transfer of these posts to genl line if the merger is materialized. ASP from TN
ReplyDeleteWell, all my colleagues, why should there be a second thought in the merger of both cadres in the first place? Its just a win win situation for all of us. Whats the latest position in CAT? Please update....
ReplyDeleteAt last cat case is heard. god only knows what could be decision. no hint also that which side argued better
ReplyDelete